The modern western gets a modern
runtime; western fans may want Out of the
Furnace
A never-do-well war veteran returns home. Unable to fit into the ordinary life of a mill town, he is sucked into an illegal fighting ring, loses his life to a crooked drug-dealing promoter. His tormented, law-abiding brother with a disgraced past will take revenge.
A century of cinema proves that time is
cyclical: genres get invented, rise in popularity, fall out of
favour, and are refashioned. The modern western displaces its outlaws
and anti-heroes, its white hats and black hats into the liminal space
bounded by the decaying inner city and interstate highways where a
weakened or absent state allows them to continue their ritual dance
of violence and blood.
Both the western and the modern western
are marked by ruthless efficiency in storytelling, characterisation,
and pacing. With a runtime of nearly 2 hours, Out of the Furnace
feels like an experiment to see if the genre can survive a drawn-out
storytelling which involves telling everything from the very
beginning, expanding what would normally be told in shorthand into
entire scenes and acts.
The trade-off is not as unbalanced as
it seems. Yes, the film has pacing issues and its step by step
storytelling feels excruciatingly tedious at points. The first act
would normally be hinted at in dialogue. The second act culminates
with Woody Harrelson’s black hat terrorising the troubled war vet
and his business partner. In a proper western that would happen within 15 minutes into the beginning. Yet the film makes up for its faults with its detailed
mood-setting, as well as more than competent performances by a great
cast of veteran character actors.
In the larger scheme of things, Out of
the Furnace isn’t that an outrageous take on the western, not with
the countless times the genre has been given extreme makeovers. It’s
just one of the extreme makeovers that prove that some rules of the
genre shouldn’t be broken that lightly.
No comments:
Post a Comment