A man is kidnapped, taken from his
family, and imprisoned in a hotel room for 20 years. During that
time, he is framed for the murder of his wife. His daughter is given
up for adoption. The day he is set free, his former captor proposes a
challenge: find out who kidnapped him and why it was done – and he
will have his just revenge.
The end result is pretty much
predictable once you consider the strengths of the man helming this
year’s adaptation of the manga: Spike Lee’s film, while not as
well made as Park’s, has better storytelling.
Park’s visually stunning and
cheerfully sardonic colours give way to a more studied and
well-thought story that doesn’t collapse like a house of cards once
you exit the cinema. Spike Lee as a writer-director understands the
weakness in the writing of both the manga and Park’s adaptation.
The third act is completely reworked so that there’s no surprise
reveal with a villain and a revenge backstory. I understand that in
the old days, the original third act would have been a sign of
incompetent writing.
Better yet, Spike Lee actually
understands what makes a Tragedy or a Revenge Tragedy: any fall from
grace can only be tragic and deserving, and a real fall, only if
there is free will involved. I understand that in the old days, the
original third act would also have been a sign of an inability to
comprehend good storytelling. The revenge backstory and the denoument
that was so botched in Park’s adaptation is much improved here.
Our verdict: Spike Lee’s Oldboy is
well worth a watch if you’re not too attached to Park Chan-wook’s
version and blind to its flaws.
No comments:
Post a Comment