Paul Dano goes full retard in
Prisoners
The film plays
like a double procedural, with Jake Gyllenhaal’s detective slowly
piecing together the pieces of the mystery (Who kidnapped the girls?
Where are they now?) despite working from a trail of several red
herrings while Jackman tortures Paul Dano using increasingly horrific
methods and finds out nothing despite working on what seems to be the
right man.
At times,
Prisoners feels like a horror film. Tight camera angles, bleak
landscapes, and all that snow and drizzle summon a sense of dread in
the audience. Gyllenhaal, Jackman, and Howard all present different
men who are challenged by an elusive truth, who see an existential
horror in how their investigations unfold: the detective in his
unravelling of a seemingly age-old pattern of kidnappings and
eventual societal negligence; the torturer in his realisation that
his demonic prisoner will never cooperate, even at the pain of death;
the friend looking at the torturer and seeing the demon he’s
become, and wondering if prudence is cowardice or tacit approval is
complicity.
One might say that
Prisoners is a film adaptation of the “Ticking Bomb” thought experiment (made even more notorious in the wake of 9/11), which
forwards a consequentialist viewpoint the torture of a suspected
terrorist in order to stop a disaster from happening. Like the
‘liberal’ solution to the thought experiment, Prisoners posits
that torture is futile, and all dramatic interest lies in the moral
event horizons crossed by torturers and their abettors.
At over 2.5 hours,
Prisoners is a film whose length isn’t as evident as recent longish
films. The script consistently underplays its weighty philosophical
and moral issues in exact opposition to the Christopher Nolan method
of spelling everything out (themes, exposition) tediously via
dialogue and over-foreshadowing plot points. The result is a film
that Christopher Nolan might well produce or direct, but looks
nothing like a Nolan title.
No comments:
Post a Comment